Shiv Sena Leader Vs BJP conflict on Twiits led by Kangana Ranauat Twiits about Farmer Bill -Why BJP Silent after this Words - Terrorist,Glided Like Snakes

 Shiv Sena on Tuesday News, Slammed Bollywood actress kangana Ranauat Twiits Comments "Terrorist Glided like snakes ,-SIV Sena wants to know the reason behind "BJP" 's Silent

Shiv Sena on Tuesday in Samna News -Give their Statement about the words used in Twitter by Kangana Ranauat about" Farm Bill Issue - "Terrorist and Glided like Snake and Asked why BJP leader's are silent
Shiv Sena on Tuesday in Samna News -Give their Statement about the words used in Twitter by Kangana Ranauat about" Farm Bill Issue - "Terrorist and Glided like Snake and Asked why BJP leader's are silent 

Mumbai:-

Shiv Sena on Tuesday slammed Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut's tweet on "Indian People's Celebration (BJP)", calling farmers protesting against a federal government-issued farm bill "terrorists".  In an editorial in Samana, News Shiv Sena mentioned that Sena was strongly opposed to the "snake-shaking" political program in which the actress was speaking at the moment.


  After handing over the money to the Rajya Sabha in the middle of the day on Sunday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi sent a series of tweets assuring the farmers that the MSP and the federal government would facilitate the farmers' procurement.  Kangana posted a selection of all of the Prime Minister's tweets, telling protesters that "identical terrorists who have been bloodied, even though no countrymen have been stripped of any citizenship as a result of the CAA".

shiv-sena-leader-on-samna-news-protest-kanganas-twiit-bjp-silent

  The actor later argued in favor of his statement, making it clear that he did not call the peasants "terrorists" and tried to explain it to anyone.  On Monday, the actor tweeted, "Like Lord Krishna, like the Narayani military, there are equally Pappur and his Champu military, aware of the need to fight the rumor mill.  I apologize and keep tweeting. "




  Kangana's naming was further mentioned in the editorial, "Farmers claim their rights as' terrorists', if anyone is saying this it is dishonest. But at the moment when an actress says that 'political events fly like snakes and they  Farmers are silent about insults.  "


  It further said that the farmers were being branded as “dishonest” and “terrorists”, but there was nothing left after they committed suicide.  The editorial in the attack, which did not name Ranaut, said, "Peasants are terrorists, Mumbai is Pakistan and the civilian substance is Babar's military and Seters."  File various allegations but the ruling BJP should expose the truth to the farmers.  That was our only hope.  ”


  If the payments made by the Modi authorities were "revolutionary and historic" then why were they forced and used to get approval for large sums of money.  The editorial further said that farmers in Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh had staged "peaceful" protests to demand the payment.



  "Farmers in Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh have taken to the streets to protest against the payment of land.  If the movements were taking place with all caution and in peace, then what would not have been the symptoms of their terrorist period?  "Mentioned in the editorial.


  The BJP has been made more aggressive by adding in the editorial, "Farmers have been lathicharged and even Babur's military has not been so persecuted."  However, those who have made this nation 'Sujalam, Sufalam' have been branded as terrorists by the pro-BJP actress.  If the name of the protesting farmer is terrorist, does the federal government approve a new agricultural bill for all of the terrorists?  "


  Shiv Sena took a completely different stand in every house of Parliament.  When payments began in the Lok Sabha, Army MPs "welcomed" it.  Later, when it was presented in the Rajya Sabha, the Army looked at it in a negative light about the payment.  Army MP Sanjay Raut noted that he would not involve the issue in a "neutral" way.


   In the statement given in the editorial, he expressed a different opinion to raise the question of payment.  "We do not want to imply by any means that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is the enemy of the farmers.  There are two aspects to the brand new bill.  The federal government ended brokerage in APMC and enabled farmers to sell their produce in external markets but who will buy them?  This is the debate.  At the moment huge industrialists are investing in grocery business.  This implies that there is a risk in investing through large industries that farmers will now fall into the new slavery of corporations.


  “Agriculture has been allowed to be acquired on an additional contract basis but the plan flops like the United States and Europe.  Farmers are worried that they will not get the minimum help.  This will not be the statement of the federal government.  It's all rumors, "Shiv Sena said.  If MSP is a matter of increase now, then why a Union Minister resigns over the payment of farms and why the farmers have taken to the streets against this payment, ”it was mentioned.

Post a Comment

Don't allow spam link

Previous Post Next Post